Pentium M 760
VS
Sempron 140

Pentium M 760 vs Sempron 140

Intel

Pentium M 760

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 2 GHz2005
VS
AMD

Sempron 140

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 760 is positioned at rank 636 and the Sempron 140 is on rank 864, so the Pentium M 760 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 760

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
98%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
98%
#624
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
855%
#625
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
842%
#626
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
773%
#627
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
770%
#628
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
763%
#630
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
736%
#631
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
706%
#632
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
705%
#633
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
686%
#636
Pentium M 760
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#638
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
99%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 140

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
18229%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
17225%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12506%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3768%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2984%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2611%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1495%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1476%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1344%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1344%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1329%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1293%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1275%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1270%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1258%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
96%
#864
Sempron 140
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
100%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
99%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
99%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
99%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
97%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
97%
#871
Core i7-4770TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $303
97%
#872
Core i5-4570T
MSRP: $195|Avg: $45
97%
#873
Athlon II X2 260u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
96%
#875
A4-3420
MSRP: $65|Avg: $30
96%
#876
Core i5-5675R
MSRP: $339|Avg: $392
96%
#877
Pentium G3470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $130
95%
#878
Core i5-3335S
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
95%
#879
Core i5-3470T
MSRP: $184|Avg: $35
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Sempron 140 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium M 760 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium M 760Sempron 140
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sargas (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium M 760Sempron 140
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 760 and Sempron 140

Intel

Pentium M 760

The Pentium M 760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Sempron 140

The Sempron 140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 513 points. Launch price was $40.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 760 and Sempron 140 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Pentium M 760 versus 2.7 GHz on the Sempron 140 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Sempron 140 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Pentium M 760 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Sempron 140 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 760 scores 515 against the Sempron 140's 513 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium M 760. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 240 vs 292, a 19.5% lead for the Sempron 140 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeaturePentium M 760Sempron 140
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.7 GHz+35%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.7 GHz+35%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
90 nm
45 nm-50%
Architecture
Dothan (2004−2005)
Sargas (2009−2011)
PassMark
515
513
Geekbench 6 Single
240
292+22%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 760 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 140 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 760 versus DDR3-1066 on the Sempron 140 — the Sempron 140 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: 915GM,915PM (Pentium M 760) and AM3,AM2+ (Sempron 140).

FeaturePentium M 760Sempron 140
Socket
PGA478
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-533
DDR3-1066+50%
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Sempron 140 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization: not specified (Pentium M 760) / AMD-V (Sempron 140). Primary use case: Pentium M 760 targets Mobile, Sempron 140 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Pentium M 760 rivals Pentium M 750; Sempron 140 rivals Celeron 420.

FeaturePentium M 760Sempron 140
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile
Budget