Pentium M 760 vs Sempron 140

Pentium M 760 vs Sempron 140 Performance Spectrum

Pentium M 760

1 / 1

515

+0.4%

Atom N280

Pentium M 1.40

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

513

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 760 vs Sempron 140 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 760 vs Sempron 140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 760

2005

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 27W instead of 45W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (240 vs 292).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Sempron 140.

Sempron 140

2009

Why buy it

✅+21.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Pentium M 760.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (513 vs 515).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 27W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 760 better than Sempron 140?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Sempron 140 is ahead with 21.7% stronger Geekbench single-core performance. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 760 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 760 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 760 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 760 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron 140 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium M 760 vs Sempron 140 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium M 760

The Pentium M 760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.

Sempron 140

The Sempron 140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 513 points. Launch price was $40.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 760 and Sempron 140 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Pentium M 760 versus 2.7 GHz on the Sempron 140 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Sempron 140 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Pentium M 760 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Sempron 140 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 760 scores 515 against the Sempron 140's 513 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium M 760. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 240 vs 292, a 19.5% lead for the Sempron 140 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Pentium M 760	Sempron 140
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.7 GHz+35%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.7 GHz+35%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	90 nm	45 nm-50%
Architecture	Dothan (2004−2005)	Sargas (2009−2011)
PassMark	515	513
Geekbench 6 Single	240	292+22%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 760 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 140 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 760 versus DDR3-1066 on the Sempron 140 — the Sempron 140 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: 915GM,915PM (Pentium M 760) and AM3,AM2+ (Sempron 140).

Feature	Pentium M 760	Sempron 140
Socket	PGA478	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-533	DDR3-1066+100%
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Sempron 140 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization: not specified (Pentium M 760) / AMD-V (Sempron 140). Primary use case: Pentium M 760 targets Mobile, Sempron 140 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Pentium M 760 rivals Pentium M 750; Sempron 140 rivals Celeron 420.