Celeron 807 vs Pentium M 760

Celeron 807

1 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2012

Pentium M 760

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 2 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron 807

1 / 2

535

+3.9%

515

0.0%

Celeron 2.10

Pentium M 1.40

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 807 is positioned at rank 1141 and the Pentium M 760 is on rank 636, so the Pentium M 760 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 807

#1129

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

3840%

#1130

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

3784%

#1131

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

3474%

#1132

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

3458%

#1133

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

3426%

#1135

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

3309%

#1136

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

3173%

#1137

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

3168%

#1138

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

3082%

#1141

Celeron 807

MSRP: $70|Avg: $10

100%

#1142

Pentium B950

MSRP: $134|Avg: $35

100%

#1143

Celeron 220

MSRP: $42|Avg: $42

100%

#1144

Pentium B960

MSRP: $134|Avg: $15

99%

#1146

Pentium 957

MSRP: $134|Avg: $10

99%

#1147

Core 2 Duo SL9400

MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A

99%

#1149

Pentium N3540

MSRP: $161|Avg: $161

98%

#1150

Core i7-3555LE

MSRP: $300|Avg: $280

98%

#1151

Core i3-2377M

MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A

97%

#1152

Core 2 Duo E8435

MSRP: $150|Avg: $74

96%

#1153

Celeron M 723

MSRP: $161|Avg: $161

96%

#1154

Core i7-3517UE

MSRP: $330|Avg: $35

95%

#1155

Core M-5Y51

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

95%

#1156

Pentium N3530

MSRP: $161|Avg: $20

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 760

#187

Core Ultra 9 288V

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

98%

#188

Core i7-10870H

MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A

98%

#624

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

855%

#625

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

842%

#626

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

773%

#627

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

770%

#628

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

763%

#630

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

736%

#631

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

706%

#632

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

705%

#633

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

686%

#636

Pentium M 760

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#638

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

MSRP: $80|Avg: $10

99%

#650

Core i5-1345UE

MSRP: $312|Avg: $312

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 807 (2012) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Celeron 807	Pentium M 760
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)	✅ More affordable ($0)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium M 760 (2005) relies on 90 nm technology and DDR2, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Celeron 807	Pentium M 760
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)	✅ More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron 807 Benchmark Check

Pentium M 760 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 807 and Pentium M 760

Celeron 807

The Celeron 807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $70.

Pentium M 760

The Pentium M 760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 807 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Pentium M 760's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 807 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium M 760 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Pentium M 760 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron 807 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium M 760 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 807 scores 535 against the Pentium M 760's 515 — a 3.8% lead for the Celeron 807. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron 807 vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 760.

Feature	Celeron 807	Pentium M 760
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	2 GHz+33%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2 MB+700%
Process	32 nm-64%	90 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	535+4%	515
Geekbench 6 Single	—	240

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 807 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 760 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 807 versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 760 — the Celeron 807 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 807 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: QM67,QS67,HM67,HM65 (Celeron 807) and 915GM,915PM (Pentium M 760).

Feature	Celeron 807	Pentium M 760
Socket	BGA1023	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+50%	DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+700%	2 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 807) / not specified (Pentium M 760). The Celeron 807 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium M 760 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 807 targets Mobile, Pentium M 760 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Pentium M 760 rivals Pentium M 750.