Pentium M 760 vs Turion 64 MT-32

Pentium M 760 vs Turion 64 MT-32 Performance Spectrum

Pentium M 760

1 / 1

515

+2.0%

Atom N280

Pentium M 1.40

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

505

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 760 vs Turion 64 MT-32 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 760 vs Turion 64 MT-32: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 760

2005

Why buy it

✅Draws 27W instead of 512W, a 485W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Turion 64 MT-32

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (505 vs 515).
❌1796.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 27W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 760 better than Turion 64 MT-32?

Yes. Pentium M 760 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 2% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 760 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 11.7% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 760 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 760 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 760 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 2.0% higher PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 760 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium M 760 vs Turion 64 MT-32 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium M 760

The Pentium M 760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion 64 MT-32

The Turion 64 MT-32 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.79 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 760 and Turion 64 MT-32 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Pentium M 760 versus 1.79 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-32 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Pentium M 760. The Pentium M 760 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Turion 64 MT-32 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 760 scores 515 against the Turion 64 MT-32's 505 — a 2% lead for the Pentium M 760. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Pentium M 760	Turion 64 MT-32
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz+12%	1.79 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB
Process	90 nm	90 nm
Architecture	Dothan (2004−2005)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	515+2%	505
Geekbench 6 Single	240	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 760 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion 64 MT-32 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.