Pentium M 760 vs Celeron J1750
Pentium M 760
Celeron J1750
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 760 is positioned at rank 636 and the Celeron J1750 is on rank 1234, so the Pentium M 760 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 760
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1750
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium M 760 | Celeron J1750 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium M 760 | Celeron J1750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 760 and Celeron J1750
Pentium M 760
The Pentium M 760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron J1750
The Celeron J1750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.41 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $72.
Processing Power
The Pentium M 760 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron J1750 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J1750 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Pentium M 760 versus 2.41 GHz on the Celeron J1750 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Celeron J1750 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.41 GHz). The Pentium M 760 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Celeron J1750 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 760 scores 515 against the Celeron J1750's 505 — a 2% lead for the Pentium M 760. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 240 vs 150, a 46.2% lead for the Pentium M 760 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium M 760 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1750.
| Feature | Pentium M 760 | Celeron J1750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.41 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.41 GHz+21% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 90 nm | 22 nm-76% |
| Architecture | Dothan (2004−2005) | Bay Trail-D (2013) |
| PassMark | 515+2% | 505 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 240+60% | 150 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 250 |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium M 760 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron J1750 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 760 versus DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron J1750 — the Celeron J1750 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron J1750 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Pentium M 760) vs 4 (Celeron J1750) — the Celeron J1750 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 915GM,915PM (Pentium M 760) and N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1750).
| Feature | Pentium M 760 | Celeron J1750 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | FCBGA1170 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-533 | DDR3L-1333+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 4 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization: not specified (Pentium M 760) / VT-x (Celeron J1750). The Celeron J1750 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium M 760 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium M 760 targets Mobile, Celeron J1750 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Pentium M 760 rivals Pentium M 750; Celeron J1750 rivals Pentium J2850.
| Feature | Pentium M 760 | Celeron J1750 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics (Bay Trail) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | Mobile | Low Power |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Pentium M 760 and Celeron J1750
