Pentium P6300 vs PRO A6-9500E

Pentium P6300 vs PRO A6-9500E Performance Spectrum

Pentium P6300

2 / 2

1,685

0.0%

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

1,689

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium P6300 vs PRO A6-9500E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium P6300 vs PRO A6-9500E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium P6300

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,685 vs 1,689).
❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while PRO A6-9500E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

PRO A6-9500E

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A6-9500E better than Pentium P6300?

Yes. PRO A6-9500E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A6-9500E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A6-9500E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A6-9500E is still the much better call for a fresh build. PRO A6-9500E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium P6300 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (21.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A6-9500E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium P6300 vs PRO A6-9500E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium P6300

The Pentium P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.27 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,685 points. Launch price was $69.

PRO A6-9500E

The PRO A6-9500E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,689 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium P6300 and PRO A6-9500E share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.27 GHz on the Pentium P6300 versus 3.4 GHz on the PRO A6-9500E — a 170.6% clock advantage for the PRO A6-9500E (base: 2.27 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Pentium P6300 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the PRO A6-9500E uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium P6300 scores 1,685 against the PRO A6-9500E's 1,689 — a 0.2% lead for the PRO A6-9500E.

Feature	Pentium P6300	PRO A6-9500E
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	0.27 GHz	3.4 GHz+1159%
Base Clock	2.27 GHz	3 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1024 kB+300%
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	1,685	1,689

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium P6300 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A6-9500E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.