Processor U300 vs Core i3-10105F

Processor U300

5 Cores6 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2023

Core i3-10105F

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Processor U300

5 / 6

8,897

0.0%

8,912

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Processor U300 is positioned at rank #488 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Processor U300

#153

Core i7-1370P

MSRP: $438|Avg: $280

99%

#476

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

636%

#477

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

627%

#478

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

576%

#479

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

573%

#480

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

568%

#482

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

548%

#483

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

526%

#484

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

525%

#485

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

511%

#488

Processor U300

MSRP: $193|Avg: $180

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-10105F

#69

Ryzen 9 9900X

MSRP: $499|Avg: $370

107%

#70

Ryzen 5 7600

MSRP: $229|Avg: $185

106%

#71

Core i5-14490F

MSRP: $209|Avg: $190

106%

#72

Core i5-12600KF

MSRP: $264|Avg: $190

106%

#73

Core i5-13600KF

MSRP: $249|Avg: $258

106%

#74

Ryzen 5 5500GT

MSRP: $125|Avg: $130

106%

#75

Ryzen 7 1700

MSRP: $140|Avg: $185

77%

#75

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G

MSRP: $309|Avg: $140

105%

#76

Ryzen 7 7700X

MSRP: $399|Avg: $249

104%

#77

Ryzen 9 5900XT

MSRP: $349|Avg: $311

103%

#78

Core i5-12500

MSRP: $212|Avg: $140

103%

#79

Core i5-14600K

MSRP: $329|Avg: $275

102%

#80

Ryzen 7 7700

MSRP: $329|Avg: $246

102%

#81

Core i5-13400F

MSRP: $196|Avg: $180

101%

#82

Core i3-12100T

MSRP: $125|Avg: $90

101%

#83

Core i7-11700F

MSRP: $298|Avg: $150

101%

#84

Core i3-10105F

MSRP: $97|Avg: $65

100%

#85

Core i5-9400T

MSRP: $182|Avg: $60

99%

#86

Core i7-12700KF

MSRP: $384|Avg: $250

99%

#87

Core i5-12490F

MSRP: $250|Avg: $150

99%

#88

Ryzen 5 5600GT

MSRP: $140|Avg: $150

99%

#89

Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G

MSRP: $146|Avg: $146

99%

#90

Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G

MSRP: $300|Avg: $180

98%

#91

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G

MSRP: $209|Avg: $120

98%

#92

Ryzen 5 8600G

MSRP: $229|Avg: $190

97%

#93

Core i7-13700KF

MSRP: $384|Avg: $350

95%

#94

Ryzen 7 9700X

MSRP: $359|Avg: $285

95%

#95

Ryzen 9 7900

MSRP: $429|Avg: $370

95%

#96

Core Ultra 5 235T

MSRP: $247|Avg: $247

95%

#97

Ryzen 9 5950X

MSRP: $799|Avg: $350

95%

#98

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $389

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Core i3-10105F shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.

Insight	Processor U300	Core i3-10105F
Gaming	Balanced gaming performance	Balanced gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($180)	✅ More affordable ($65)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-U (2023) / 10 nm)	✨ Modern (Comet Lake-R (2021) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The Core i3-10105F leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 64% cheaper ($65 vs $180) while identifying as the stronger performer.

Insight	Processor U300	Core i3-10105F
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+177%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($180)	✅ More affordable ($65)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Processor U300 Benchmark Check

Core i3-10105F Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Processor U300 and Core i3-10105F

Processor U300

The Processor U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,897 points. Launch price was $193.

Core i3-10105F

The Core i3-10105F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,912 points. Launch price was $97.

⚡

Processing Power

The Processor U300 packs 5 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i3-10105F offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Processor U300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Processor U300 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10105F — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Processor U300 uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-10105F uses Comet Lake-R (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Processor U300 scores 8,897 against the Core i3-10105F's 8,912 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-10105F. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Processor U300 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105F.

Feature	Processor U300	Core i3-10105F
Cores / Threads	5 / 6+25%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	3.7 GHz+208%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+33%	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-U (2023)	Comet Lake-R (2021)
PassMark	8,897	8,912
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,461
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	4,503

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Processor U300 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i3-10105F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Processor U300	Core i3-10105F
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Processor U300) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10105F).

Feature	Processor U300	Core i3-10105F
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Processor U300 launched at $193 MSRP, while the Core i3-10105F debuted at $97. At current prices ($180 vs $65), the Core i3-10105F is $115 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor U300 delivers 49.4 pts/$ vs 137.1 pts/$ for the Core i3-10105F — making the Core i3-10105F the 94% better value option.