
Quadro 5010M vs GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

Quadro 5010M
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 5010M is positioned at rank 19 and the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is on rank 388, so the Quadro 5010M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5010M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 5010M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro 5010M | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5010M and GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

Quadro 5010M
The Quadro 5010M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,691 points.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 5010M scores 1,691 and the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5010M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 5010M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro 5010M) vs 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition).
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,691 | 1,726+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 0.8333 TFLOPS+21% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+2300% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 5010M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition has 512 MB. The Quadro 5010M offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 5010M) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) — the Quadro 5010M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 5010M draws 100W versus the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5010M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 16.9 | 34.5+104% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | GF110 | GK107 |
| Release | February 22 2011 | November 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #733 | #925 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















