Quadro 5010M vs GeForce GTX 760M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 5010M is positioned at rank 19 and the GeForce GTX 760M is on rank 97, so the Quadro 5010M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5010M

#4

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

262%

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

62%

#19

Quadro 5010M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#26

RTX A400

MSRP: $135|Avg: $135

79%

#29

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $100

71%

#33

Radeon PRO W6400

MSRP: $229|Avg: $200

65%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760M

#28

Radeon RX 6650M XT

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

99%

#30

Radeon 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

94%

#31

Radeon RX 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

94%

#87

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

252%

#89

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

228%

#90

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

227%

#94

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

207%

#95

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

205%

#97

GeForce GTX 760M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

100%

#100

GeForce 945M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $98

98%

#103

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

96%

#105

GeForce GTX 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

95%

#106

Radeon HD 7470M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $12

95%

#110

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 760M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 5010M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro 5010M	GeForce GTX 760M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 760M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro 5010M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 760M Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5010M and GeForce GTX 760M

Quadro 5010M

The Quadro 5010M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,691 points.

GeForce GTX 760M

The GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 657 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 5010M scores 1,691 and the GeForce GTX 760M reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5010M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 760M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 5010M) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 760M). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro 5010M) vs 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760M).

Feature	Quadro 5010M	GeForce GTX 760M
G3D Mark Score	1,691	1,726+2%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	768+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	1.009 TFLOPS+46%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	48	64+33%
L1 Cache	768 KB+1100%	64 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 5010M	GeForce GTX 760M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 5010M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760M has 2 GB. The Quadro 5010M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 5010M) vs 256 KB (GeForce GTX 760M) — the Quadro 5010M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 5010M	GeForce GTX 760M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 5010M draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 760M's 55W — a 58.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5010M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.