Quadro 5010M vs Intel UHD Graphics P750
Quadro 5010M
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics P750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 5010M is positioned at rank #19 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5010M
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics P750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2011). The Intel UHD Graphics P750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 5010M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 5010M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics P750.
| Insight | Quadro 5010M | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 5010M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5010M and Intel UHD Graphics P750
Quadro 5010M
The Quadro 5010M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,691 points.
Intel UHD Graphics P750
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 5010M scores 1,691 and the Intel UHD Graphics P750 reaches 1,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5010M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 uses Generation 12.1, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 5010M) vs 256 (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro 5010M) vs 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P750).
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,691+1% | 1,669 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 384+50% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS+4% | 0.6656 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 64+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 5010M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics P750 has 0 MB. The Quadro 5010M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 5010M draws 100W versus the Intel UHD Graphics P750's 15W — a 147.8% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5010M) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 15W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 16.9 | 111.3+559% |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $100 |
| Codename | GF110 | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Release | February 22 2011 | 2021 |
| Ranking | #733 | #717 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 5010M and Intel UHD Graphics P750
