Quadro 5010M vs UHD Graphics 750

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro 5010M

100

1,691

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 980

GeForce GTX 1080

TITAN V

Intel UHD Graphics 750

15

1,702

+0.7%

Iris Graphics 6100

HD Graphics 630

HD Graphics P530

Iris Plus Graphics 650

Arc A380

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 5010M is positioned at rank #19 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5010M

#4

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

262%

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

62%

#19

Quadro 5010M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#26

RTX A400

MSRP: $135|Avg: $135

79%

#29

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $100

71%

#33

Radeon PRO W6400

MSRP: $229|Avg: $200

65%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2011). The Intel UHD Graphics 750 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 5010M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 5010M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro 5010M	Intel UHD Graphics 750
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (14nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro 5010M Benchmark Check

Intel UHD Graphics 750 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5010M and Intel UHD Graphics 750

Quadro 5010M

The Quadro 5010M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,691 points.

Intel UHD Graphics 750

The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,702 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 5010M scores 1,691 and the Intel UHD Graphics 750 reaches 1,702 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5010M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 750 uses Generation 12.1, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 5010M) vs 256 (Intel UHD Graphics 750). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro 5010M) vs 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 750).

Feature	Quadro 5010M	Intel UHD Graphics 750
G3D Mark Score	1,691	1,702
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Generation 12.1
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm+++
Shading Units	384+50%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS+4%	0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	48+200%	16

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 5010M	Intel UHD Graphics 750
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 5010M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 750 has 0 MB. The Quadro 5010M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	Quadro 5010M	Intel UHD Graphics 750
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 5010M draws 100W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 750's 15W — a 147.8% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5010M) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.