Quadro FX 1300 vs GeForce 6150 LE
Quadro FX 1300
Popular choices:
GeForce 6150 LE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 1300 is positioned at rank 421 and the GeForce 6150 LE is on rank 688, so the Quadro FX 1300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1300
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6150 LE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 6150 LE is significantly newer (2017 vs 2008). The GeForce 6150 LE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 1300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 1300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 6150 LE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1300 | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 6150 LE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 6150 LE holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 45.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1300 | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+45.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1300 and GeForce 6150 LE
Quadro FX 1300
The Quadro FX 1300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $3,499.
GeForce 6150 LE
The GeForce 6150 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 1300 scores 34 and the GeForce 6150 LE reaches 33 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1300 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 6150 LE uses Pascal, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1300) vs 384 (GeForce 6150 LE). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1300) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6150 LE).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1300 | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34+3% | 33 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 384+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 0.7972 TFLOPS+28% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 1300 | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 1300 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6150 LE has 512 MB. The GeForce 6150 LE offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1300) vs 512 KB (GeForce 6150 LE) — the GeForce 6150 LE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1300 | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0a (Quadro FX 1300) vs 9.0c (GeForce 6150 LE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1300 | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0a | 9.0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 1300 draws 189W versus the GeForce 6150 LE's 10W — a 179.9% difference. The GeForce 6150 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1300) vs 350W (GeForce 6150 LE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1300 | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 10W-95% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 3.3+1550% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 1300 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 6150 LE launched at $30 and now averages $10. The GeForce 6150 LE costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.3 (Quadro FX 1300) vs 3.3 (GeForce 6150 LE) — the GeForce 6150 LE offers 43.5% better value. The GeForce 6150 LE is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1300 | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $30-95% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3 | 3.3+43% |
| Codename | GT200B | GP108 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #815 | #657 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 1300 and GeForce 6150 LE
