Quadro FX 1300 vs GeForce 6200

Quadro FX 1300

2008Core: 610 MHz

GeForce 6200

2019Core: 937 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

+8.8%

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 1300 is positioned at rank 421 and the GeForce 6200 is on rank 734, so the Quadro FX 1300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1300

#406

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

246217%

#421

Quadro FX 1300

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

100%

#422

Quadro FX 3400/4400

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50

100%

#423

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

83%

#424

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

67%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

33%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

17%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6200

#724

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

37438%

#726

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

33938%

#727

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

33848%

#731

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

30779%

#732

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

30569%

#734

GeForce 6200

MSRP: $129|Avg: $10

100%

#736

GeForce FX 5500

MSRP: $37|Avg: $30

76%

#737

RADEON 9500

MSRP: $179|Avg: $30

69%

#738

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

MSRP: $229|Avg: $25

69%

#739

RADEON X850 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $50

55%

#740

RADEON 9800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $399

52%

#742

RADEON 9000

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

34%

#743

RADEON 9200 SE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $15

34%

#744

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

28%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

21%

#746

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

21%

#747

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

17%

#748

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

14%

#749

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

14%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 6200 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The GeForce 6200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 1300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 6200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (256 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1300.

Insight	Quadro FX 1300	GeForce 6200
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+8.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 6200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $15 for the Quadro FX 1300, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 63.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro FX 1300	GeForce 6200
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+63.2%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15)	✅More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 1300 Benchmark Check

GeForce 6200 Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1300 and GeForce 6200

Quadro FX 1300

The Quadro FX 1300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $3,499.

GeForce 6200

The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 1300 scores 34 versus the GeForce 6200's 37 — the GeForce 6200 leads by 8.8%. The Quadro FX 1300 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 6200 uses Pascal, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1300) vs 384 (GeForce 6200). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1300) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200).

Feature	Quadro FX 1300	GeForce 6200
G3D Mark Score	34	37+9%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	55 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	240	384+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	0.7972 TFLOPS+28%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+233%	24
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1300	GeForce 6200
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 1300 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6200 has 256 MB. The GeForce 6200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1300) vs 512 KB (GeForce 6200) — the GeForce 6200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 1300	GeForce 6200
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.25 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0a (Quadro FX 1300) vs 9.0c (GeForce 6200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Quadro FX 1300	GeForce 6200
DirectX	9_0a	9.0c
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1300 draws 189W versus the GeForce 6200's 10W — a 179.9% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1300) vs 350W (GeForce 6200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Quadro FX 1300	GeForce 6200
TDP	189W	10W-95%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	1mm	168mm
Height	—	100mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	—	65°C
Perf/Watt	0.2	3.7+1750%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 1300 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 6200 launched at $129 and now averages $10. The GeForce 6200 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.3 (Quadro FX 1300) vs 3.7 (GeForce 6200) — the GeForce 6200 offers 60.9% better value. The GeForce 6200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).