Quadro FX 1300 vs GeForce PCX 5750

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 1300 is positioned at rank 421 and the GeForce PCX 5750 is on rank 366, so the GeForce PCX 5750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1300

#406

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

246217%

#421

Quadro FX 1300

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

100%

#422

Quadro FX 3400/4400

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50

100%

#423

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

83%

#424

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

67%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

33%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

17%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce PCX 5750

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

31539%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

30300%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

29948%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

29896%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

29835%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

29665%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

29291%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

29183%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

28913%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

28835%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

28487%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

28426%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

27913%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

27896%

#351

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

34783%

#366

GeForce PCX 5750

MSRP: $150|Avg: $15

100%

#367

GeForce FX 5700

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

91%

#368

RADEON X800 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $20

87%

#369

RADEON X800 XL

MSRP: $349|Avg: $15

87%

#370

RADEON 9600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

78%

#371

RADEON X800 PRO

MSRP: $399|Avg: $15

70%

#372

GeForce FX 5200LE

MSRP: $43|Avg: $25

70%

#373

GeForce FX 5200SE

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

52%

#374

RADEON 9800 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $30

48%

#375

GeForce FX 5200

MSRP: $70|Avg: $25

48%

#376

GeForce PCX 5300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

43%

#377

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

39%

#378

GeForce FX 5900

MSRP: $399|Avg: $20

39%

#379

GeForce FX 5100

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

35%

#380

GeForce FX 5600

MSRP: $200|Avg: $10

30%

#381

GeForce FX 5600XT

MSRP: $129|Avg: $10

30%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce PCX 5750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1300.

Insight	Quadro FX 1300	GeForce PCX 5750
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce PCX 5750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce PCX 5750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro FX 1300	GeForce PCX 5750
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+2.9%)
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 1300 Benchmark Check

GeForce PCX 5750 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1300 and GeForce PCX 5750

Quadro FX 1300

The Quadro FX 1300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $3,499.

GeForce PCX 5750

The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1300 scores 34 and the GeForce PCX 5750 reaches 35 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1300 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce PCX 5750 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1300) vs 480 (GeForce PCX 5750). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1300) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750).

Feature	Quadro FX 1300	GeForce PCX 5750
G3D Mark Score	34	35+3%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	480+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	1.405 TFLOPS+126%
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	80+33%	60
L2 Cache	256 KB	640 KB+150%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1300	GeForce PCX 5750
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1300) vs 640 KB (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce PCX 5750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 1300	GeForce PCX 5750
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	640 KB+150%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0a (Quadro FX 1300) vs 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5750). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Quadro FX 1300	GeForce PCX 5750
DirectX	9_0a	9.0a
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1300 draws 189W versus the GeForce PCX 5750's 219W — a 14.7% difference. The Quadro FX 1300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1300) vs 350W (GeForce PCX 5750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Quadro FX 1300	GeForce PCX 5750
TDP	189W-14%	219W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	1mm	168mm
Height	—	100mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 1300 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce PCX 5750 launched at $150 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.3 (Quadro FX 1300) vs 2.3 (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce PCX 5750 offers 0% better value. The GeForce PCX 5750 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).