Quadro FX 1300 vs Quadro FX 1100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro FX 1300 is positioned at rank #421 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1300

#406

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

246217%

#421

Quadro FX 1300

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

100%

#422

Quadro FX 3400/4400

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50

100%

#423

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

83%

#424

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

67%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

33%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

17%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 1100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (256 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1300.

Insight	Quadro FX 1300	Quadro FX 1100
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+5.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro FX 1300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 1300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $500), it costs 97% less, resulting in a 3048.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro FX 1300	Quadro FX 1100
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+3048.1%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($15)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 1300 Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 1100 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1300 and Quadro FX 1100

Quadro FX 1300

The Quadro FX 1300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Quadro FX 1100

The Quadro FX 1100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 1300 scores 34 versus the Quadro FX 1100's 36 — the Quadro FX 1100 leads by 5.9%. The Quadro FX 1300 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 1100 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1300) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1100). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1300) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1100).

Feature	Quadro FX 1300	Quadro FX 1100
G3D Mark Score	34	36+6%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	240	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1300	Quadro FX 1100
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 1300 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1100 has 256 MB. The Quadro FX 1100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Quadro FX 1300	Quadro FX 1100
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.25 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0a (Quadro FX 1300) vs 9_0a (Quadro FX 1100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Quadro FX 1300	Quadro FX 1100
DirectX	9_0a	9_0a
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1300 draws 189W versus the Quadro FX 1100's 189W — a 0% difference. The Quadro FX 1100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1300) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 190mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Quadro FX 1300	Quadro FX 1100
TDP	189W	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	190mm
Slots	1	1
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 1300 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Quadro FX 1100 launched at $0 and now averages $500. The Quadro FX 1300 costs 97% less ($485 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.3 (Quadro FX 1300) vs 0.1 (Quadro FX 1100) — the Quadro FX 1300 offers 2200% better value.