
Quadro FX 1300 vs GeForce FX 5700VE

Quadro FX 1300
Popular choices:

GeForce FX 5700VE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro FX 1300 is positioned at rank #421 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1300
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 1300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce FX 5700VE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1300 | GeForce FX 5700VE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 1300 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1300 and GeForce FX 5700VE

Quadro FX 1300
The Quadro FX 1300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $3,499.

GeForce FX 5700VE
The GeForce FX 5700VE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 1300 scores 34 and the GeForce FX 5700VE reaches 33 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1300 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce FX 5700VE uses Rankine, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1300) vs 480 (GeForce FX 5700VE). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1300) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700VE).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1300 | GeForce FX 5700VE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34+3% | 33 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 480+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.405 TFLOPS+126% |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 80+33% | 60 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 640 KB+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 1300 | GeForce FX 5700VE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 1300 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5700VE has 256 MB. The GeForce FX 5700VE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1300) vs 640 KB (GeForce FX 5700VE) — the GeForce FX 5700VE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1300 | GeForce FX 5700VE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.25 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 640 KB+150% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0a (Quadro FX 1300) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700VE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1300 | GeForce FX 5700VE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0a | 9.0a |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 1300 draws 189W versus the GeForce FX 5700VE's 219W — a 14.7% difference. The Quadro FX 1300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1300) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5700VE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1300 | GeForce FX 5700VE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-14% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 170mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 1300 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce FX 5700VE launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce FX 5700VE costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.3 (Quadro FX 1300) vs Infinity (GeForce FX 5700VE) — the GeForce FX 5700VE offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce FX 5700VE is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1300 | GeForce FX 5700VE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GT200B | GF110 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | December 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #815 | #497 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











