Quadro FX 1300
VS
GeForce RTX 2060

Quadro FX 1300 vs GeForce RTX 2060

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1300

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

2019Core: 1365 MHzBoost: 1680 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro FX 1300 is positioned at rank #421 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1300

#406
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
246217%
#421
Quadro FX 1300
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
100%
#422
Quadro FX 3400/4400
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50
100%
#423
Quadro FX 4000
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50
83%
#424
RADEON IGP 320
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
67%
#425
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
33%
#426
Quadro FX 2000
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40
17%
#427
GRID V100-8Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000
0%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 2060 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The GeForce RTX 2060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 1300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 41411.8% higher G3D Mark score and 4700% more VRAM (6 GB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1300.

InsightQuadro FX 1300GeForce RTX 2060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-41411.8%)
Leading raw performance (+41411.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $120 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 5089% better value per dollar than the Quadro FX 1300.

InsightQuadro FX 1300GeForce RTX 2060
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+5089%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1300 and GeForce RTX 2060

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1300

The Quadro FX 1300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $3,499.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 1300 scores 34 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 41411.8%. The Quadro FX 1300 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 55 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1300) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1300) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060).

FeatureQuadro FX 1300GeForce RTX 2060
G3D Mark Score
34
14,114+41412%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Turing
Process Node
55 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
240
1920+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
6.451 TFLOPS+937%
ROPs
32
48+50%
TMUs
80
120+50%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
3 MB+1100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 1300GeForce RTX 2060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 1300 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 4700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 1300) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 1300GeForce RTX 2060
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
6 GB+4700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
192-bit+200%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
3 MB+1100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0a (Quadro FX 1300) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro FX 1300GeForce RTX 2060
DirectX
9_0a
12 Ultimate (12_2)+33%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1300 draws 189W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 16.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1300) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureQuadro FX 1300GeForce RTX 2060
TDP
189W
160W-15%
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
1mm
229mm
Height
113mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
72
Perf/Watt
0.2
88.2+44000%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 1300 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The Quadro FX 1300 costs 87.5% less ($105 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.3 (Quadro FX 1300) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 5013% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 1300GeForce RTX 2060
MSRP
$599
$349-42%
Avg Price (30d)
$15-88%
$120
Performance per Dollar
2.3
117.6+5013%
Codename
GT200B
TU106
Release
November 11 2008
January 7 2019
Ranking
#815
#168