CPU
GPU
Quadro FX 1700
Popular choices:
GeForce Go 7600 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 1700 is positioned at rank 395 and the GeForce Go 7600 GT is on rank 331, so the GeForce Go 7600 GT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1700
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7600 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 1700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7600 GT.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1700 | GeForce Go 7600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 1700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1700 and GeForce Go 7600 GT
Quadro FX 1700
The Quadro FX 1700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $3,499.
GeForce Go 7600 GT
The GeForce Go 7600 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 210 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 1700 scores 216 and the GeForce Go 7600 GT reaches 210 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce Go 7600 GT uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 1,152 (GeForce Go 7600 GT). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700) vs 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7600 GT).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700 | GeForce Go 7600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 216+3% | 210 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 1152+380% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 2.378 TFLOPS+282% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 96+20% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700 | GeForce Go 7600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 1700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7600 GT has 256 MB. The Quadro FX 1700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1700) vs 512 KB (GeForce Go 7600 GT) — the GeForce Go 7600 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700 | GeForce Go 7600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7600 GT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700 | GeForce Go 7600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0+11% | 9.0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 1700 draws 189W versus the GeForce Go 7600 GT's 170W — a 10.6% difference. The GeForce Go 7600 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1700) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7600 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700 | GeForce Go 7600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 170W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce Go 7600 GT is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700 | GeForce Go 7600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | — |
| Codename | GT200B | GK104 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | June 25 2013 |
| Ranking | #815 | #450 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 1700 and GeForce Go 7600 GT
