Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon HD 8250
Quadro FX 1700
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 1700 is positioned at rank 395 and the Radeon HD 8250 is on rank 250, so the Radeon HD 8250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1700
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8250
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 1700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8250.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1700 | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8250 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8250 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $500), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 881.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1700 | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+881.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1700 and Radeon HD 8250
Quadro FX 1700
The Quadro FX 1700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Radeon HD 8250
The Radeon HD 8250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 212 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 1700 scores 216 and the Radeon HD 8250 reaches 212 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8250). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8250).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700 | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 216+2% | 212 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 1024+327% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.761 TFLOPS+183% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700 | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1700) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8250) — the Radeon HD 8250 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700 | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 1700 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 8250's 130W — a 37% difference. The Radeon HD 8250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1700) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700 | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 130W-31% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1 | 1.6+45% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 1700 launched at $699 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon HD 8250 launched at $50 and now averages $50. The Radeon HD 8250 costs 90% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.4 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 4.2 (Radeon HD 8250) — the Radeon HD 8250 offers 950% better value. The Radeon HD 8250 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700 | Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $50-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $50-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4 | 4.2+950% |
| Codename | GT200B | Pitcairn |
| Release | November 11 2008 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #815 | #503 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 1700 and Radeon HD 8250
