Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon R5 230

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon R5 230 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon R5 230: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1700

2008

Why buy it

✅22.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1298% HIGHER MSRP
$699 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Radeon R5 230

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $649 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1336.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.4 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 1700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 1700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 230 instead at 222 vs 216, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 1700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 230 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $649 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1336.8% (4.4 vs 0.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 230 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 1700 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon R5 230 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 1700

The Quadro FX 1700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon R5 230

The Radeon R5 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 222 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1700 scores 216 and the Radeon R5 230 reaches 222 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R5 230 uses GCN 3.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 384 (Radeon R5 230). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 230).

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon R5 230
G3D Mark Score	216	222+3%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	384+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	0.7864 TFLOPS+26%
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	80+233%	24
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon R5 230
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1700 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 230. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1700) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 230) — the Quadro FX 1700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon R5 230
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 230). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon R5 230
DirectX	10_0	11.2+12%
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1700 draws 189W versus the Radeon R5 230's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon R5 230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1700) vs 350W (Radeon R5 230). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon R5 230
TDP	189W	50W-74%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	168mm
Slots	1	1
Perf/Watt	1.1	4.4+300%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 1700 came in at $699, while the Radeon R5 230 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon R5 230 was 92.8% cheaper ($649 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 4.4 (Radeon R5 230) — the Radeon R5 230 offers 1366.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 230 (2017 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon R5 230
MSRP	$699	$50-93%
Performance per Dollar	0.3	4.4+1367%
Codename	GT200B	Weston
Release	November 11 2008	April 18 2017
Ranking	#815	#873

Search Quadro FX 1700 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 230 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.