Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon HD 7450
Quadro FX 1700
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 7450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 1700 is positioned at rank 395 and the Radeon HD 7450 is on rank 228, so the Radeon HD 7450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1700
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7450
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1700.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1700 | Radeon HD 7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7450 holds the technical lead. Priced at $12 (vs $500), it costs 98% less, resulting in a 4221% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1700 | Radeon HD 7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4221%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($12) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1700 and Radeon HD 7450
Quadro FX 1700
The Quadro FX 1700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Radeon HD 7450
The Radeon HD 7450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 224 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 1700 scores 216 and the Radeon HD 7450 reaches 224 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7450 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7450). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7450).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700 | Radeon HD 7450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 216 | 224+4% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 1792+647% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 2.867 TFLOPS+361% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700 | Radeon HD 7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 1700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7450 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 7450 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1700) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7450) — the Radeon HD 7450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700 | Radeon HD 7450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 7450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700 | Radeon HD 7450 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 11.2+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 1700 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 7450's 200W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 1700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1700) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700 | Radeon HD 7450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W-6% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 1700 launched at $699 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon HD 7450 launched at $45 and now averages $12. The Radeon HD 7450 costs 97.6% less ($488 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.4 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 18.7 (Radeon HD 7450) — the Radeon HD 7450 offers 4575% better value. The Radeon HD 7450 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700 | Radeon HD 7450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $45-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $12-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4 | 18.7+4575% |
| Codename | GT200B | Tahiti |
| Release | November 11 2008 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #815 | #454 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 1700 and Radeon HD 7450
