Quadro FX 1700 vs Quadro FX 4500

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1700 vs Quadro FX 4500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1700 vs Quadro FX 4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1700

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Measures 168mm instead of 230mm, a 62mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 4500

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌36.9% longer card at 230mm vs 168mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 4500 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.1% in PassMark G3D (227 vs 216), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 1700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 1700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 4500 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro FX 1700 vs Quadro FX 4500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 1700

The Quadro FX 1700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Quadro FX 4500

The Quadro FX 4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 227 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 1700 scores 216 versus the Quadro FX 4500's 227 — the Quadro FX 4500 leads by 5.1%. The Quadro FX 1700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 4500 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 240 (Quadro FX 4500). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4500).

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Quadro FX 4500
G3D Mark Score	216	227+5%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	240	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Quadro FX 4500
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1700 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4500.

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Quadro FX 4500
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 9_0c (Quadro FX 4500). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Quadro FX 4500
DirectX	10_0+11%	9_0c
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1700 draws 189W versus the Quadro FX 4500's 189W — a 0% difference. The Quadro FX 4500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1700) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 230mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Quadro FX 4500
TDP	189W	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	230mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Perf/Watt	1.1	1.2+9%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 1700 came in at $699, while the Quadro FX 4500 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro FX 4500 was 100+% cheaper ($699 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (Quadro FX 1700) vs Infinity (Quadro FX 4500) — the Quadro FX 4500 offers Infinity% better value.

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Quadro FX 4500
MSRP	$699	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.3	Infinity
Codename	GT200B	GT200B
Release	November 11 2008	November 11 2008
Ranking	#815	#815

Search Quadro FX 1700 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 4500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.