Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon R3E

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon R3E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon R3E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1700

2008

Why buy it

✅7.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.
❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.

Radeon R3E

2019

Why buy it

✅Quadro FX 1700 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R3E is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 1700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 1700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R3E instead at 225 vs 216, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R3E is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 1700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 1700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R3E has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon R3E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 1700

The Quadro FX 1700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon R3E

The Radeon R3E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 225 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1700 scores 216 and the Radeon R3E reaches 225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R3E uses GCN 4.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 512 (Radeon R3E). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon R3E).

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon R3E
G3D Mark Score	216	225+4%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	55 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	240	512+113%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	1.247 TFLOPS+100%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+150%	32
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon R3E
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1700 and 64-bit on the Radeon R3E. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1700) vs 512 KB (Radeon R3E) — the Radeon R3E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon R3E
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 12_0 (Radeon R3E). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon R3E
DirectX	10_0	12_0+20%
Max Displays	2	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1700 draws 189W versus the Radeon R3E's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon R3E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1700) vs 350W (Radeon R3E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon R3E
TDP	189W	50W-74%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	1mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Perf/Watt	1.1	4.5+309%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 1700 came in at $699, while the Radeon R3E launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon R3E was 100+% cheaper ($699 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.3 (Quadro FX 1700) vs Infinity (Radeon R3E) — the Radeon R3E offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R3E (2019 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon R3E
MSRP	$699	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.3	Infinity
Codename	GT200B	Polaris 23
Release	November 11 2008	May 13 2019
Ranking	#815	#757

Search Quadro FX 1700 on Amazon

Search Radeon R3E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.