Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon HD 6470M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon HD 6470M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon HD 6470M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1700

2008

Why buy it

✅0.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌152% higher power demand at 189W vs 75W.

Radeon HD 6470M

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 189W, a 114W reduction.
✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 1700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 1700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 6470M instead at 225 vs 216, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 1700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 1700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon HD 6470M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 1700

The Quadro FX 1700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 6470M

The Radeon HD 6470M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 225 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1700 scores 216 and the Radeon HD 6470M reaches 225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6470M uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1700) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6470M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6470M).

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon HD 6470M
G3D Mark Score	216	225+4%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	960+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	1.306 TFLOPS+110%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80+67%	48
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon HD 6470M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 1700 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6470M carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 6470M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1700 and System on the Radeon HD 6470M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1700) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6470M) — the Radeon HD 6470M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon HD 6470M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1700 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 6470M's 75W — a 86.4% difference. The Radeon HD 6470M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1700) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6470M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon HD 6470M
TDP	189W	75W-60%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	1.1	3.0+173%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 6470M (2011 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 1700	Radeon HD 6470M
MSRP	$699	—
Codename	GT200B	Blackcomb
Release	November 11 2008	January 4 2011
Ranking	#815	#654

Search Quadro FX 1700 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6470M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.