Quadro FX 3700 vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Quadro FX 3700
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro FX 3700 is positioned at rank #401 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3700
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is significantly newer (2022 vs 2008). The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 3700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3096.8% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 3700.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3096.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3096.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $500 for the Quadro FX 3700, it costs 70% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 10555.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+10555.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3700 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Quadro FX 3700
The Quadro FX 3700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $3,499.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3700 scores 372 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 3096.8%. The Quadro FX 3700 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 55 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3700) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3700) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 372 | 11,892+3097% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 2560+967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+1344% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3700) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 8 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro FX 3700) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 12.2+22% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3700 draws 189W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 37% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3700) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 235mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 130W-31% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0 | 91.5+4475% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 3700 launched at $1599 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 70% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.7 (Quadro FX 3700) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 11228.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3700 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599 | $249-84% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $150-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.7 | 79.3+11229% |
| Codename | GT200B | GA106 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #815 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 3700 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
