
Quadro FX 380 LP

Radeon HD 4290
Quadro FX 380 LP vs Radeon HD 4290 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 380 LP vs Radeon HD 4290 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 380 LP vs Radeon HD 4290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 380 LP
2008Why buy it
- ✅4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌181.7% HIGHER MSRP$169 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
Radeon HD 4290
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $109 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 173.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale (2005−2013) on 55nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 380 LP across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 380 LP vs Radeon HD 4290 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 380 LP
The Quadro FX 380 LP is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 4290
The Radeon HD 4290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 141 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 380 LP scores 145 and the Radeon HD 4290 reaches 141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 380 LP is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 4290 uses TeraScale, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4290). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4290).
| Feature | Quadro FX 380 LP | Radeon HD 4290 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 145+3% | 141 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 800+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.36 TFLOPS+119% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 380 LP | Radeon HD 4290 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 380 LP and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4290.
| Feature | Quadro FX 380 LP | Radeon HD 4290 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 380 LP draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 4290's 190W — a 0.5% difference. The Quadro FX 380 LP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4290). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro FX 380 LP | Radeon HD 4290 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8+14% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro FX 380 LP came in at $169, while the Radeon HD 4290 launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4290 was 64.5% cheaper ($109 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 4290) — the Radeon HD 4290 offers 166.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 4290 (2009 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 380 LP | Radeon HD 4290 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $60-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 2.4+167% |
| Codename | GT200B | RV790 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | April 2 2009 |
| Ranking | #815 | #762 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














