Quadro FX 380 LP vs Radeon HD 4290

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380 LP

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 4290

2009Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 380 LP vs Radeon HD 4290 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 380 LP vs Radeon HD 4290 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 380 LP vs Radeon HD 4290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 380 LP

2008

Why buy it

  • 4.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 181.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $169 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4290

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $109 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • Delivers 173.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • More future proof: TeraScale (2005−2013) on 55nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 380 LP across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 380 LP is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (145 vs 141), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 380 LP is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4290 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $109 cheaper on MSRP at $60 vs $169, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 173.9% (2.4 vs 0.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4290 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 380 LP has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 380 LP vs Radeon HD 4290 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380 LP

The Quadro FX 380 LP is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 4290

The Radeon HD 4290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 141 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 380 LP scores 145 and the Radeon HD 4290 reaches 141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 380 LP is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 4290 uses TeraScale, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4290). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4290).

FeatureQuadro FX 380 LPRadeon HD 4290
G3D Mark Score
145+3%
141
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TeraScale
Process Node
55 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
240
800+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
1.36 TFLOPS+119%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+100%
40
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 380 LPRadeon HD 4290
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 380 LP and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4290.

FeatureQuadro FX 380 LPRadeon HD 4290
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 380 LP draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 4290's 190W — a 0.5% difference. The Quadro FX 380 LP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4290). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro FX 380 LPRadeon HD 4290
TDP
189W
190W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
0.8+14%
0.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 380 LP came in at $169, while the Radeon HD 4290 launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4290 was 64.5% cheaper ($109 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 4290) — the Radeon HD 4290 offers 166.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 4290 (2009 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 380 LPRadeon HD 4290
MSRP
$169
$60-64%
Performance per Dollar
0.9
2.4+167%
Codename
GT200B
RV790
Release
November 11 2008
April 2 2009
Ranking
#815
#762

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.