Quadro FX 4800 vs FirePro M4150
Quadro FX 4800
Popular choices:
FirePro M4150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 4800 is positioned at rank 379 and the FirePro M4150 is on rank 211, so the FirePro M4150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4800
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M4150
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M4150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 4800.
| Insight | Quadro FX 4800 | FirePro M4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M4150 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M4150 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $80), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 61% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 4800 | FirePro M4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+61%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 4800 and FirePro M4150
Quadro FX 4800
The Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $1,799.
FirePro M4150
The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 4800 scores 1,005 and the FirePro M4150 reaches 1,011 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the FirePro M4150 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4800) vs 384 (FirePro M4150). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4800) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro M4150).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4800 | FirePro M4150 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,005 | 1,011 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 0.5491 TFLOPS+19% |
| ROPs | 24+200% | 8 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 4800 | FirePro M4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 4800 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro M4150 has 4 GB. The FirePro M4150 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 4800) vs 256 KB (FirePro M4150) — the FirePro M4150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4800 | FirePro M4150 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.5 GB | 4 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 4800 draws 150W versus the FirePro M4150's 150W — a 0% difference. The FirePro M4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4800) vs 350W (FirePro M4150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4800 | FirePro M4150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 4800 launched at $1799 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the FirePro M4150 launched at $200 and now averages $50. The FirePro M4150 costs 37.5% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.6 (Quadro FX 4800) vs 20.2 (FirePro M4150) — the FirePro M4150 offers 60.3% better value. The FirePro M4150 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4800 | FirePro M4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1799 | $200-89% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $50-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6 | 20.2+60% |
| Codename | GT200B | Opal |
| Release | November 11 2008 | October 16 2013 |
| Ranking | #884 | #879 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 4800 and FirePro M4150
