Quadro K4000 vs FirePro R5000
Quadro K4000
Popular choices:
FirePro R5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K4000 is positioned at rank 283 and the FirePro R5000 is on rank 272, so the FirePro R5000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K4000
Performance Per Dollar FirePro R5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro R5000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K4000 | FirePro R5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (279mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K4000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K4000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $150), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 54.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K4000 | FirePro R5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+54.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K4000 and FirePro R5000
Quadro K4000
The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.
FirePro R5000
The FirePro R5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,647 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K4000 scores 2,719 and the FirePro R5000 reaches 2,647 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4000 is built on Kepler while the FirePro R5000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Quadro K4000) vs 768 (FirePro R5000). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000) vs 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro R5000).
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | FirePro R5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,719+3% | 2,647 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.244 TFLOPS | 1.267 TFLOPS+2% |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 64+33% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 192 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | FirePro R5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K4000 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro R5000 has 4 GB. The FirePro R5000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (Quadro K4000) vs 512 KB (FirePro R5000) — the FirePro R5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | FirePro R5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K4000 draws 80W versus the FirePro R5000's 150W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro K4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4000) vs 350W (FirePro R5000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | FirePro R5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-47% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 279mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 34.0+93% | 17.6 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K4000 launched at $1269 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the FirePro R5000 launched at $1099 and now averages $150. The Quadro K4000 costs 33.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.2 (Quadro K4000) vs 17.6 (FirePro R5000) — the Quadro K4000 offers 54.5% better value.
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | FirePro R5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1269 | $1099-13% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-33% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.2+55% | 17.6 |
| Codename | GK106 | Pitcairn |
| Release | March 1 2013 | February 25 2013 |
| Ranking | #613 | #619 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K4000 and FirePro R5000
