Quadro K4000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Quadro K4000
Popular choices:
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K4000 is positioned at rank #283 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K4000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (3 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs.
| Insight | Quadro K4000 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K4000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K4000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Quadro K4000
The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K4000 scores 2,719 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs reaches 2,715 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4000 is built on Kepler while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro K4000) vs 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs).
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,719 | 2,715 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+860% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K4000 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has 0 MB. The Quadro K4000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K4000 draws 80W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs's 28W — a 96.3% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4000) vs 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 28W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 34.0 | 97.0+185% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K4000 launched at $1269 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs costs 100+% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.2 (Quadro K4000) vs Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1269 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK106 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | March 1 2013 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #613 | #584 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K4000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
