Quadro K4000 vs GeForce GTX 560
Quadro K4000
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 560
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K4000 is positioned at rank #283 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K4000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K4000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K4000 | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $100), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 239.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K4000 | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+239.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K4000 and GeForce GTX 560
Quadro K4000
The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.
GeForce GTX 560
The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K4000 scores 2,719 and the GeForce GTX 560 reaches 2,768 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4000 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 560 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro K4000) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 560). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560).
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,719 | 2,768+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+129% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.244 TFLOPS+14% | 1.089 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 64+14% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 448 KB+600% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K4000 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 has 1 GB. The Quadro K4000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (Quadro K4000) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 560) — the GeForce GTX 560 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+200% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K4000 draws 80W versus the GeForce GTX 560's 150W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro K4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4000) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-47% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 34.0+84% | 18.5 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K4000 launched at $1269 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce GTX 560 launched at $199 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 560 costs 70% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.2 (Quadro K4000) vs 92.3 (GeForce GTX 560) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 239.3% better value. The Quadro K4000 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro K4000 | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1269 | $199-84% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $30-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.2 | 92.3+239% |
| Codename | GK106 | GF114 |
| Release | March 1 2013 | May 17 2011 |
| Ranking | #613 | #605 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K4000 and GeForce GTX 560
