Quadro K4100M vs GeForce RTX 4060
Quadro K4100M
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K4100M is positioned at rank #52 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K4100M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Quadro K4100M?
Comparing the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB to the Quadro K4100M highlights the enormous gap between modern midrange performance and legacy mobile professional hardware. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a 2023 efficient powerhouse with a massive memory buffer, while the Quadro K4100M was a high-end workstation GPU for laptops in 2013 based on the Kepler architecture.\n\nThe RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is roughly 15-20 times faster in desktop applications and gaming benchmarks. It features modern technologies like DLSS 3 Frame Generation and dedicated Ray Tracing cores that allow it to run any modern title at high settings. The Quadro K4100M, while once a powerful tool for mobile engineers, now lacks the necessary driver support and hardware features to handle modern professional software or gaming effectively.\n\nUltimately, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a versatile modern workhorse that excels in both gaming and professional creative tasks with its 16GB VRAM. The Quadro K4100M is now a legacy component, best suited for maintaining old hardware rather than powering a modern workflow. The upgrade to an RTX 4060 Ti represents a transformative shift in both workflow speed and visual fidelity.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K4100M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 604.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K4100M.
| Insight | Quadro K4100M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-604.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+604.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $261), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 515.3% better value per dollar than the Quadro K4100M.
| Insight | Quadro K4100M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+515.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($261) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K4100M and GeForce RTX 4060
Quadro K4100M
The Quadro K4100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,773 points. Launch price was $1,499.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro K4100M scores 2,773 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 604.9%. The Quadro K4100M is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro K4100M) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro K4100M) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | Quadro K4100M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,773 | 19,548+605% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152 | 3072+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.627 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+829% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 96 | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 0.09 MB | 3 MB+3233% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 24 MB+4700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro K4100M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro K4100M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K4100M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K4100M) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K4100M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 24 MB+4700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K4100M draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 14% difference. The Quadro K4100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4100M) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Quadro K4100M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-13% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 73°C |
| Perf/Watt | 27.7 | 170.0+514% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K4100M launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $261, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The Quadro K4100M costs 12.7% less ($38 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.6 (Quadro K4100M) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 517% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K4100M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $299-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $261-13% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.6 | 65.4+517% |
| Codename | GK104 | AD107 |
| Release | July 23 2013 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #604 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K4100M and GeForce RTX 4060
