
Quadro K4100M vs GeForce GTX 560

Quadro K4100M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 560
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K4100M is positioned at rank #52 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K4100M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K4100M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 560.
| Insight | Quadro K4100M | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 560 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $261), it costs 89% less, resulting in a 768.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K4100M | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+768.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($261) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K4100M and GeForce GTX 560

Quadro K4100M
The Quadro K4100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,773 points. Launch price was $1,499.

GeForce GTX 560
The GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,768 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K4100M scores 2,773 and the GeForce GTX 560 reaches 2,768 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4100M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 560 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro K4100M) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 560). Raw compute: 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro K4100M) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560).
| Feature | Quadro K4100M | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,773 | 2,768 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+243% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.627 TFLOPS+49% | 1.089 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+71% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 448 KB+367% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K4100M | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K4100M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 has 1 GB. The Quadro K4100M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro K4100M | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K4100M draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 560's 150W — a 40% difference. The Quadro K4100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4100M) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro K4100M | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-33% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 27.7+50% | 18.5 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K4100M launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $261, while the GeForce GTX 560 launched at $199 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 560 costs 88.5% less ($231 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.6 (Quadro K4100M) vs 92.3 (GeForce GTX 560) — the GeForce GTX 560 offers 770.8% better value. The Quadro K4100M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro K4100M | GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $199-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $261 | $30-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.6 | 92.3+771% |
| Codename | GK104 | GF114 |
| Release | July 23 2013 | May 17 2011 |
| Ranking | #604 | #605 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











