Quadro M2000
VS
GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

Quadro M2000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

NVIDIA

Quadro M2000

2016Core: 796 MHzBoost: 1163 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

2018Core: 1152 MHzBoost: 1417 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
98%
#22
Radeon RX 7700
MSRP: $449|Avg: $399
94%
#56
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
207%
#58
188%
#59
188%
#63
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
171%
#64
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
169%
#66
100%
#68
GeForce GTX 850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
97%
#78
Radeon HD 8970M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $170
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design.

InsightQuadro M2000GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro M2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $50 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2.6% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design.

InsightQuadro M2000GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2.6%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2000 and GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

NVIDIA

Quadro M2000

The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,925 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M2000 scores 4,026 and the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design reaches 3,925 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro M2000) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000) vs 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1163 MHz vs 1417 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M2000GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score
4,026+3%
3,925
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
768
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.786 TFLOPS
2.177 TFLOPS+22%
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1417 MHz+22%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
48
L1 Cache
288 KB
288 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M2000GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureQuadro M2000GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M2000) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro M2000GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
DirectX
12_1
12 (12_1)
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs NVDEC (3rd Gen).

FeatureQuadro M2000GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Encoder
NVENC 2nd Gen
NVENC (6th Gen)
Decoder
NVDEC 2nd Gen
NVDEC (3rd Gen)
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2000 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro M2000GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
167mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
53.7+3%
52.3
💰

Value Analysis

Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 80.5 (Quadro M2000) vs 78.5 (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) — the Quadro M2000 offers 2.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).

FeatureQuadro M2000GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
MSRP
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$50
Performance per Dollar
80.5+3%
78.5
Codename
GM206
GP107
Release
April 8 2016
January 3 2018
Ranking
#491
#429