CPU
GPU
Quadro M2000
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition.
| Insight | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M2000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2000 and GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Quadro M2000
The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 797 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,927 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M2000 scores 4,026 and the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition reaches 3,927 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Quadro M2000) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition). Raw compute: 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000) vs 2.142 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition).
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,026+3% | 3,927 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1344+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.786 TFLOPS | 2.142 TFLOPS+20% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 112+133% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB+157% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M2000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition has 2 GB. The Quadro M2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2000) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) — the Quadro M2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M2000 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 167mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 53.7+37% | 39.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M2000 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | — |
| Codename | GM206 | GK104 |
| Release | April 8 2016 | November 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #491 | #803 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M2000 and GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
