Quadro M2000
VS
FirePro W8000

Quadro M2000 vs FirePro W8000

NVIDIA

Quadro M2000

2016Core: 796 MHzBoost: 1163 MHz
VS

FirePro W8000

2012Core: 900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8000

#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
97%
#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
88%
#245
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5554%
#260
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
100%
#261
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
99%
#262
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
99%
#264
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
97%
#265
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
94%
#266
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
94%
#267
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
94%
#268
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
94%
#269
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
93%
#270
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
92%
#271
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
92%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
91%
#273
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro W8000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M2000.

InsightQuadro M2000FirePro W8000
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-5.8%)
Leading raw performance (+5.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (279mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro M2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $1,599), it costs 97% less, resulting in a 2923% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro M2000FirePro W8000
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2923%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,599)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2000 and FirePro W8000

NVIDIA

Quadro M2000

The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.

AMD

FirePro W8000

The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro M2000 scores 4,026 versus the FirePro W8000's 4,259 — the FirePro W8000 leads by 5.8%. The Quadro M2000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the FirePro W8000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Quadro M2000) vs 1,792 (FirePro W8000). Raw compute: 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro W8000).

FeatureQuadro M2000FirePro W8000
G3D Mark Score
4,026
4,259+6%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
1792+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.786 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS+81%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
112+133%
L1 Cache
288 KB
448 KB+56%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M2000FirePro W8000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2000) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro W8000) — the Quadro M2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro M2000FirePro W8000
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M2000) vs 12 (FirePro W8000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureQuadro M2000FirePro W8000
DirectX
12_1
12
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W8000). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs UVD 3.2.

FeatureQuadro M2000FirePro W8000
Encoder
NVENC 2nd Gen
VCE 1.0
Decoder
NVDEC 2nd Gen
UVD 3.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2000 draws 75W versus the FirePro W8000's 225W — a 100% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000) vs 350W (FirePro W8000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 279mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureQuadro M2000FirePro W8000
TDP
75W-67%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
167mm
279mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
58°C
Perf/Watt
53.7+184%
18.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M2000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the FirePro W8000 launched at $1599 and now averages $1599. The Quadro M2000 costs 96.9% less ($1549 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 80.5 (Quadro M2000) vs 2.7 (FirePro W8000) — the Quadro M2000 offers 2881.5% better value. The Quadro M2000 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureQuadro M2000FirePro W8000
MSRP
$0-100%
$1599
Avg Price (30d)
$50-97%
$1599
Performance per Dollar
80.5+2881%
2.7
Codename
GM206
Tahiti
Release
April 8 2016
June 14 2012
Ranking
#491
#481