
Quadro M2000
Popular choices:

FirePro W8000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W8000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M2000.
| Insight | Quadro M2000 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (279mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $1,599), it costs 97% less, resulting in a 2923% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M2000 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2923%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,599) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2000 and FirePro W8000

Quadro M2000
The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.

FirePro W8000
The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro M2000 scores 4,026 versus the FirePro W8000's 4,259 — the FirePro W8000 leads by 5.8%. The Quadro M2000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the FirePro W8000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Quadro M2000) vs 1,792 (FirePro W8000). Raw compute: 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro W8000).
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,026 | 4,259+6% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1792+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.786 TFLOPS | 3.226 TFLOPS+81% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 112+133% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 448 KB+56% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2000) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro W8000) — the Quadro M2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M2000) vs 12 (FirePro W8000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W8000). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs UVD 3.2.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd Gen | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M2000 draws 75W versus the FirePro W8000's 225W — a 100% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000) vs 350W (FirePro W8000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 279mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 279mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 58°C |
| Perf/Watt | 53.7+184% | 18.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M2000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the FirePro W8000 launched at $1599 and now averages $1599. The Quadro M2000 costs 96.9% less ($1549 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 80.5 (Quadro M2000) vs 2.7 (FirePro W8000) — the Quadro M2000 offers 2881.5% better value. The Quadro M2000 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-97% | $1599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.5+2881% | 2.7 |
| Codename | GM206 | Tahiti |
| Release | April 8 2016 | June 14 2012 |
| Ranking | #491 | #481 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















