
Quadro M2000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro M2000 is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The Quadro M2000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 570 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 60% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 570.
| Insight | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+60%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 570 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $50), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 95.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+95.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2000 and GeForce GTX 570

Quadro M2000
The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.

GeForce GTX 570
The GeForce GTX 570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,930 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M2000 scores 4,026 and the GeForce GTX 570 reaches 3,930 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 570 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro M2000) vs 480 (GeForce GTX 570). Raw compute: 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 570).
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,026+2% | 3,930 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+60% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.786 TFLOPS+27% | 1.405 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 48 | 60+25% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 960 KB+233% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+59% | 0.63 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M2000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 570 has 3 GB. The Quadro M2000 offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 320-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2000) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 570) — the Quadro M2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+60% | 2.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 320-bit+400% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+59% | 0.63 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M2000) vs 11_0 (GeForce GTX 570). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000) vs PureVideo HD (GeForce GTX 570). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs PureVideo HD.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd Gen | PureVideo HD |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | PureVideo HD |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M2000 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 570's 219W — a 98% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 167mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-66% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 167mm | 267mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 53.7+200% | 17.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M2000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 570 launched at $349 and now averages $25. The GeForce GTX 570 costs 50% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 80.5 (Quadro M2000) vs 157.2 (GeForce GTX 570) — the GeForce GTX 570 offers 95.3% better value. The Quadro M2000 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $25-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.5 | 157.2+95% |
| Codename | GM206 | GF110 |
| Release | April 8 2016 | December 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #491 | #497 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















