
Quadro M2000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 660
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 660 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M2000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 660 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 660 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $50), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 234.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+234.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2000 and GeForce GTX 660

Quadro M2000
The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.

GeForce GTX 660
The GeForce GTX 660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,040 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M2000 scores 4,026 and the GeForce GTX 660 reaches 4,040 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 660 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Quadro M2000) vs 960 (GeForce GTX 660). Raw compute: 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000) vs 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660). Boost clocks: 1163 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,026 | 4,040 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 960+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.786 TFLOPS | 1.981 TFLOPS+11% |
| Boost Clock | 1163 MHz+13% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 48 | 80+67% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB+260% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+163% | 0.38 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M2000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 660 has 3 GB. The Quadro M2000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2000) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 660) — the Quadro M2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+163% | 0.38 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M2000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 660). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 660). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd Gen | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | — | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M2000 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 660's 140W — a 60.5% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 660). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 167mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-46% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 167mm | 241mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 53.7+86% | 28.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M2000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 660 launched at $229 and now averages $15. The GeForce GTX 660 costs 70% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 80.5 (Quadro M2000) vs 269.3 (GeForce GTX 660) — the GeForce GTX 660 offers 234.5% better value. The Quadro M2000 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro M2000 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $229 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $15-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.5 | 269.3+235% |
| Codename | GM206 | GK106 |
| Release | April 8 2016 | September 6 2012 |
| Ranking | #491 | #490 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















