Quadro M2000 vs GeForce GTX 1060

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 150% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M2000.

Insight	Quadro M2000	GeForce GTX 1060
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-150%)	✅Leading raw performance (+150%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $60), it costs 17% less, resulting in a 108.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro M2000	GeForce GTX 1060
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+108.3%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($50)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro M2000 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2000 and GeForce GTX 1060

Quadro M2000

The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro M2000 scores 4,026 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 150%. The Quadro M2000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro M2000) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1163 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M2000	GeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score	4,026	10,064+150%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	768	2560+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.786 TFLOPS	8.873 TFLOPS+397%
Boost Clock	1163 MHz	1733 MHz+49%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	48	160+233%
L1 Cache	288 KB	960 KB+233%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M2000	GeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M2000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2000) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M2000	GeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	6 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	192-bit+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M2000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro M2000	GeForce GTX 1060
DirectX	12_1	12
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs NVDEC (Pascal).

Feature	Quadro M2000	GeForce GTX 1060
Encoder	NVENC 2nd Gen	NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	NVDEC 2nd Gen	NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2000 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 82.4% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 167mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Quadro M2000	GeForce GTX 1060
TDP	75W-58%	180W
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	6-pin
Length	167mm	173mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Perf/Watt	53.7	55.9+4%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M2000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The Quadro M2000 costs 16.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 80.5 (Quadro M2000) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 108.3% better value.