
Quadro M4000

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Quadro M4000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M4000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M4000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M4000
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $209 less on MSRP ($791 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.4 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7130 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon Pro WX 7130
2016Why buy it
- ✅13.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌26.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$791 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M4000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.

Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M4000 scores 6,679 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M4000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 1243 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,679+4% | 6,406 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,280 | 2304+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.496 TFLOPS | 5.728 TFLOPS+129% |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 1243 MHz+23% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 144+80% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB | 576 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro M4000 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 7130.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130).
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M4000 draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 26.1% difference. The Quadro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-23% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C-4% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 66.8+35% | 49.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro M4000 came in at $791, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000. On MSRP, Quadro M4000 was 20.9% cheaper ($209 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.4 (Quadro M4000) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Quadro M4000 offers 31.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 7130 (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M4000 | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $791-21% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.4+31% | 6.4 |
| Codename | GM204 | Ellesmere |
| Release | August 18 2015 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #392 | #331 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














