Quadro M4000 vs Radeon RX 6300M

CPU

GPU

Quadro M4000

2015Core: 975 MHzBoost: 1013 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon RX 6300M

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Quadro M4000 vs Radeon RX 6300M Performance Spectrum

Quadro M4000

8 GB 100

6,679

+4.0%

GeForce MX450

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)

6,421

0.0%

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M4000 vs Radeon RX 6300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M4000 vs Radeon RX 6300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M4000

2015

Why buy it

✅36.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $791 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro M4000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 36.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4% in PassMark G3D (6,679 vs 6,421), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Quadro M4000 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro M4000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro M4000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 6300M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro M4000 vs Radeon RX 6300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M4000

The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M4000 scores 6,679 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M4000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M4000	Radeon RX 6300M
G3D Mark Score	6,679+4%	6,421
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1,280+67%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.496 TFLOPS	3.686 TFLOPS+48%
Boost Clock	1013 MHz	2400 MHz+137%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	80+67%	48
L1 Cache	480 KB+88%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro M4000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Quadro M4000	Radeon RX 6300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M4000 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300M carries 4 GB. Quadro M4000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro M4000) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300M) — a 229.7% advantage for the Quadro M4000. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro M4000 and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M4000) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) — the Quadro M4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M4000	Radeon RX 6300M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	211 GB/s+230%	64 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+700%	32-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro M4000	Radeon RX 6300M
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs Navi 24 Media. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M).

Feature	Quadro M4000	Radeon RX 6300M
Encoder	5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)	—
Decoder	1st Gen NVDEC	Navi 24 Media
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M4000 draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Quadro M4000	Radeon RX 6300M
TDP	100W	35W-65%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	241mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	82°C	70°C-15%
Perf/Watt	66.8	183.5+175%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300M (2022 vs 2015).

Feature	Quadro M4000	Radeon RX 6300M
MSRP	$791	—
Codename	GM204	Navi 24
Release	August 18 2015	January 4 2022
Ranking	#392	#379

Search Quadro M4000 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 6300M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.