
Quadro M500M
Popular choices:

Radeon R5 430 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro M500M
2016Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Quadro M500M
2016Radeon R5 430 OEM
2016Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R5 430 OEM better than Quadro M500M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro M500M make more sense than Radeon R5 430 OEM?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro M500M | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 15 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 8 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro M500M | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 21 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro M500M | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 14 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro M500M | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M500M and Radeon R5 430 OEM

Quadro M500M
Quadro M500M
The Quadro M500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 27 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R5 430 OEM
The Radeon R5 430 OEM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 30 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 780 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M500M scores 1,172 and the Radeon R5 430 OEM reaches 1,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M500M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 430 OEM uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M500M) vs 384 (Radeon R5 430 OEM). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro M500M) vs 0.599 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 430 OEM). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 780 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M500M | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,172 | 1,200+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS+44% | 0.599 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz+44% | 780 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 | 24+50% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+33% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M500M | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M500M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 430 OEM has 512 MB. The Quadro M500M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M500M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R5 430 OEM) — the Quadro M500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M500M | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M500M draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 430 OEM's 50W — a 50% difference. The Quadro M500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M500M) vs 250W (Radeon R5 430 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro M500M | Radeon R5 430 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1+63% | 24.0 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













