GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro M500M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro M500M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro M500M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 295

2009

Why buy it

✅26.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌863.3% higher power demand at 289W vs 30W.

Quadro M500M

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 289W, a 259W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 295 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 295 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 26.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (1,198 vs 1,172), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 295 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 295 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro M500M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 295

The GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 480 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 289W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,198 points. Launch price was $500.

Quadro M500M

The Quadro M500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 27 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 295 scores 1,198 and the Quadro M500M reaches 1,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 295 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro M500M uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 384 (Quadro M500M). Raw compute: 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 295) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro M500M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	Quadro M500M
G3D Mark Score	1,198+2%	1,172
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Maxwell
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	480 ×2+25%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5962 TFLOPS ×2	0.8632 TFLOPS+45%
ROPs	28 ×2+250%	8
TMUs	80 ×2+400%	16
L2 Cache	0.22 MB	1 MB+355%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 295 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M500M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	Quadro M500M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 295 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M500M carries 2 GB. Quadro M500M gives you 14.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 295 and 64-bit on the Quadro M500M. L2 Cache: 0.22 MB (GeForce GTX 295) vs 1 MB (Quadro M500M) — the Quadro M500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	Quadro M500M
VRAM Capacity	1.75 GB	2 GB+14%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.22 MB	1 MB+355%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 295 draws 289W versus the Quadro M500M's 30W — a 162.4% difference. The Quadro M500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 680W (GeForce GTX 295) vs 350W (Quadro M500M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	Quadro M500M
TDP	289W	30W-90%
Recommended PSU	680W	350W-49%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	95°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.1	39.1+854%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro M500M (2016 vs 2009).

Feature	GeForce GTX 295	Quadro M500M
MSRP	$499	—
Codename	GT200B	GM108
Release	January 8 2009	April 27 2016
Ranking	#816	#833

Search GeForce GTX 295 on Amazon

Search Quadro M500M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.