Quadro M520 vs Moore Threads MTT S70
Quadro M520
Popular choices:
Moore Threads MTT S70
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro M520 is positioned at rank #145 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M520
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S70
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro M520 is significantly newer (2017 vs 0). The Quadro M520 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Moore Threads MTT S70.
| Insight | Quadro M520 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | MUSA (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M520 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $140 for the Moore Threads MTT S70, it costs 64% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 184.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M520 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+184.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($140) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M520 and Moore Threads MTT S70
Quadro M520
The Quadro M520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1041 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,913 points.
Moore Threads MTT S70
The Moore Threads MTT S70 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1600 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M520 scores 1,913 and the Moore Threads MTT S70 reaches 1,880 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M520 is built on Maxwell while the Moore Threads MTT S70 uses MUSA, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M520) vs 3,584 (Moore Threads MTT S70). Raw compute: 0.7995 TFLOPS (Quadro M520) vs 11.47 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S70).
| Feature | Quadro M520 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,913+2% | 1,880 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | MUSA |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 3584+833% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7995 TFLOPS | 11.47 TFLOPS+1335% |
| ROPs | 8 | 224+2700% |
| TMUs | 16 | 224+1300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3.5 MB+250% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M520 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M520 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Moore Threads MTT S70 has 512 MB. The Quadro M520 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M520) vs 3.5 MB (Moore Threads MTT S70) — the Moore Threads MTT S70 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M520 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3.5 MB+250% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M520 draws 25W versus the Moore Threads MTT S70's 220W — a 159.2% difference. The Quadro M520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M520) vs 600W (Moore Threads MTT S70). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin.
| Feature | Quadro M520 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-89% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 76.5+800% | 8.5 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M520 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Moore Threads MTT S70 launched at $345 and now averages $140. The Quadro M520 costs 64.3% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 38.3 (Quadro M520) vs 13.4 (Moore Threads MTT S70) — the Quadro M520 offers 185.8% better value.
| Feature | Quadro M520 | Moore Threads MTT S70 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-42% | $345 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-64% | $140 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.3+186% | 13.4 |
| Codename | GM108 | Chunxiao |
| Release | January 11 2017 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #695 | #694 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M520 and Moore Threads MTT S70
