Quadro M600M vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

NVIDIA

Quadro M600M

2015Core: 837 MHzBoost: 876 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

2021Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro M600M vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M600M vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M600M

2015

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% higher power demand at 30W vs 15W.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

2021

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 30W, a 15W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 12 (2021−2023) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M600M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (2,221 vs 2,200), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro M600M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M600M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro M600M vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro M600M

The Quadro M600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M600M scores 2,221 and the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) reaches 2,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M600M is built on Maxwell while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) uses Gen. 12, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M600M) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M600MUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
G3D Mark Score
2,221
2,200
Architecture
Maxwell
Gen. 12
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384+1100%
32
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1450 MHz+66%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M600MUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M600M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) carries 0 MB. Quadro M600M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M600M and System on the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake).

FeatureQuadro M600MUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro M600M) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureQuadro M600MUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro M600M) vs Quick Sync Video (Xe) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs Quick Sync Video (Xe). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M600M) vs AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)).

FeatureQuadro M600MUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Encoder
NVENC 4th Gen
Quick Sync Video (Xe)
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP5)
Quick Sync Video (Xe)
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M600M draws 30W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)'s 15W — a 66.7% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M600M) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureQuadro M600MUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
TDP
30W
15W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
74.0
146.7+98%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (2021 vs 2015).

FeatureQuadro M600MUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
MSRP
$0
Codename
GM107
Rocket Lake Xe
Release
August 18 2015
March 30 2021
Ranking
#658
#809

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.