
Quadro M600M
Popular choices:

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro M600M is positioned at rank #25 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M600M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M600M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake).
| Insight | Quadro M600M | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M600M and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Quadro M600M
The Quadro M600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M600M scores 2,221 and the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) reaches 2,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M600M is built on Maxwell while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) uses Gen. 12, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M600M) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M600M | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,221 | 2,200 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 12 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+1100% | 32 |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1450 MHz+66% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M600M | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M600M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) has 0 MB. The Quadro M600M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro M600M | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro M600M) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro M600M | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro M600M) vs Quick Sync Video (Xe) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs Quick Sync Video (Xe). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M600M) vs AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)).
| Feature | Quadro M600M | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th Gen | Quick Sync Video (Xe) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP5) | Quick Sync Video (Xe) |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M600M draws 30W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)'s 15W — a 66.7% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M600M) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro M600M | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 15W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 74.0 | 146.7+98% |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M600M | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $0 |
| Codename | GM107 | Rocket Lake Xe |
| Release | August 18 2015 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #658 | #809 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















