Quadro NVS 420 vs GeForce 6800 GT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6800 GT

#718

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

30158%

#720

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

27339%

#721

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

27267%

#725

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

24794%

#726

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

24625%

#728

GeForce 6800 GT

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

100%

#729

GeForce 7950 GX2

MSRP: $599|Avg: $80

94%

#730

Mobility Radeon X1450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

92%

#731

MOBILITY RADEON X1800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

92%

#732

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

83%

#733

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP

MSRP: $20|Avg: $5

83%

#734

GeForce 6200

MSRP: $129|Avg: $10

81%

#736

GeForce FX 5500

MSRP: $37|Avg: $30

61%

#737

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

MSRP: $229|Avg: $25

56%

#738

RADEON 9500

MSRP: $179|Avg: $30

56%

#739

RADEON X850 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $50

44%

#740

RADEON 9800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $399

42%

#742

RADEON 9000

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

28%

#743

RADEON 9200 SE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $15

28%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro NVS 420 is significantly newer (2018 vs 2008). The Quadro NVS 420 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6800 GT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 6800 GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro NVS 420 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro NVS 420	GeForce 6800 GT
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+1500%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro NVS 420 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $40 for the GeForce 6800 GT, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 93% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro NVS 420	GeForce 6800 GT
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+93%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($20)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro NVS 420 Benchmark Check

GeForce 6800 GT Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro NVS 420 and GeForce 6800 GT

Quadro NVS 420

The Quadro NVS 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.

GeForce 6800 GT

The GeForce 6800 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 142 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro NVS 420 scores 137 and the GeForce 6800 GT reaches 142 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro NVS 420 is built on Pascal while the GeForce 6800 GT uses G9x, both on 16 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 224 (GeForce 6800 GT).

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	GeForce 6800 GT
G3D Mark Score	137	142+4%
Architecture	Pascal	G9x
Process Node	16 nm	65 nm
Shading Units	2304+929%	224

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	GeForce 6800 GT
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro NVS 420 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6800 GT has 256 MB. The Quadro NVS 420 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	GeForce 6800 GT
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+1500%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 9.0c (GeForce 6800 GT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	GeForce 6800 GT
DirectX	10_0+11%	9.0c
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (Quadro NVS 420) vs No (GeForce 6800 GT). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs PureVideo.

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	GeForce 6800 GT
Encoder	PureVideo HD	No
Decoder	PureVideo HD	PureVideo
Codecs	—	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro NVS 420 draws 100W versus the GeForce 6800 GT's 150W — a 40% difference. The Quadro NVS 420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 420) vs 350W (GeForce 6800 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 160mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	GeForce 6800 GT
TDP	100W-33%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	160mm	216mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	1.4+56%	0.9

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro NVS 420 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce 6800 GT launched at $399 and now averages $40. The Quadro NVS 420 costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.8 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 3.5 (GeForce 6800 GT) — the Quadro NVS 420 offers 94.3% better value. The Quadro NVS 420 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2008).