
Quadro NVS 420 vs GeForce RTX 4060

Quadro NVS 420
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 14168.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro NVS 420.
| Insight | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-14168.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+14168.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 854.4% better value per dollar than the Quadro NVS 420.
| Insight | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+854.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro NVS 420 and GeForce RTX 4060

Quadro NVS 420
The Quadro NVS 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.

GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro NVS 420 scores 137 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 14168.6%. The Quadro NVS 420 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 420) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1647 MHz vs 2460 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 137 | 19,548+14169% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3072+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.589 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+99% |
| Boost Clock | 1647 MHz | 2460 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144+50% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 0.84 MB | 3 MB+257% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 24 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro NVS 420 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro NVS 420 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro NVS 420) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 24 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 12 Ultimate+20% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (Quadro NVS 420) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC 5th gen.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro NVS 420 draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 14% difference. The Quadro NVS 420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 420) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-13% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 73°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 170.0+12043% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro NVS 420 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The Quadro NVS 420 costs 93.3% less ($279 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.8 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 861.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-93% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 65.4+862% |
| Codename | GP104 | AD107 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #266 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











