Quadro NVS 420 vs RADEON HD 6350

NVIDIA

Quadro NVS 420

2018Core: 1227 MHzBoost: 1647 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON HD 6350

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro NVS 420 vs RADEON HD 6350 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro NVS 420 vs RADEON HD 6350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro NVS 420 vs RADEON HD 6350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro NVS 420

2018

Why buy it

  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • RADEON HD 6350 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro NVS 420 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 100W instead of 186W, a 86W reduction.
  • Measures 160mm instead of 168mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

RADEON HD 6350

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 86% higher power demand at 186W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON HD 6350 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (141 vs 137), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro NVS 420 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON HD 6350 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON HD 6350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro NVS 420 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro NVS 420 vs RADEON HD 6350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro NVS 420

The Quadro NVS 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.

AMD

RADEON HD 6350

The RADEON HD 6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 141 points. Launch price was $180.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro NVS 420 scores 137 and the RADEON HD 6350 reaches 141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro NVS 420 is built on Pascal while the RADEON HD 6350 uses TeraScale 3, both on 16 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 1,280 (RADEON HD 6350). Raw compute: 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 420) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (RADEON HD 6350).

FeatureQuadro NVS 420RADEON HD 6350
G3D Mark Score
137
141+3%
Architecture
Pascal
TeraScale 3
Process Node
16 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2304+80%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
7.589 TFLOPS+295%
1.92 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
144+80%
80
L1 Cache
864 KB+170%
320 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro NVS 420RADEON HD 6350
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro NVS 420 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD 6350 carries 512 MB. Quadro NVS 420 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 420 and 128-bit on the RADEON HD 6350. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro NVS 420) vs 0.5 MB (RADEON HD 6350) — the Quadro NVS 420 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro NVS 420RADEON HD 6350
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 11.2 (11_0) (RADEON HD 6350). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureQuadro NVS 420RADEON HD 6350
DirectX
10_0
11.2 (11_0)+12%
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (Quadro NVS 420) vs None (RADEON HD 6350). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD 2.2.

FeatureQuadro NVS 420RADEON HD 6350
Encoder
PureVideo HD
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro NVS 420 draws 100W versus the RADEON HD 6350's 186W — a 60.1% difference. The Quadro NVS 420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 420) vs 350W (RADEON HD 6350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 160mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureQuadro NVS 420RADEON HD 6350
TDP
100W-46%
186W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
160mm
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
1.4+75%
0.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro NVS 420 came in at $0, while the RADEON HD 6350 launched at $30. On MSRP, Quadro NVS 420 was 100+% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro NVS 420) vs 4.7 (RADEON HD 6350) — the Quadro NVS 420 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro NVS 420 (2018 vs 2011).

FeatureQuadro NVS 420RADEON HD 6350
MSRP
$0-100%
$30
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
4.7
Codename
GP104
Cayman
Release
February 21 2018
December 1 2011
Ranking
#266
#598

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.