Quadro NVS 420 vs Radeon HD 4330

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro NVS 420 vs Radeon HD 4330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro NVS 420 vs Radeon HD 4330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro NVS 420

2018

Why buy it

✅8.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Radeon HD 4330 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro NVS 420 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4330

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro NVS 420 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro NVS 420 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (137 vs 135), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro NVS 420 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4330 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4330 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro NVS 420 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro NVS 420 vs Radeon HD 4330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro NVS 420

The Quadro NVS 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.

Radeon HD 4330

The Radeon HD 4330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 135 points. Launch price was $130.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro NVS 420 scores 137 and the Radeon HD 4330 reaches 135 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro NVS 420 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 4330 uses TeraScale, both on 16 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 640 (Radeon HD 4330). Raw compute: 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 420) vs 0.736 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4330).

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	Radeon HD 4330
G3D Mark Score	137+1%	135
Architecture	Pascal	TeraScale
Process Node	16 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	2304+260%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	7.589 TFLOPS+931%	0.736 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	144+350%	32
L1 Cache	864 KB+575%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	Radeon HD 4330
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro NVS 420 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4330 carries 512 MB. Quadro NVS 420 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 420 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4330. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro NVS 420) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 4330) — the Quadro NVS 420 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	Radeon HD 4330
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro NVS 420 draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 4330's 95W — a 5.1% difference. The Radeon HD 4330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 420) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4330). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	Radeon HD 4330
TDP	100W	95W-5%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	160mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	1.4	1.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro NVS 420 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 4330 launched at $50. On MSRP, Quadro NVS 420 was 100+% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro NVS 420) vs 2.7 (Radeon HD 4330) — the Quadro NVS 420 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro NVS 420 (2018 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	Radeon HD 4330
MSRP	$0-100%	$50
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	2.7
Codename	GP104	RV770
Release	February 21 2018	October 21 2008
Ranking	#266	#920

Search Quadro NVS 420 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4330 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.