Quadro NVS 420 vs Radeon HD 6290M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro NVS 420 vs Radeon HD 6290M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro NVS 420 vs Radeon HD 6290M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro NVS 420

2018

Why buy it

✅1.4% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Radeon HD 6290M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro NVS 420 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Radeon HD 6290M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro NVS 420 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro NVS 420 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.4% in average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 6290M instead at 140 vs 137, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro NVS 420 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro NVS 420 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro NVS 420 vs Radeon HD 6290M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro NVS 420

The Quadro NVS 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.

Radeon HD 6290M

The Radeon HD 6290M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 140 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro NVS 420 scores 137 and the Radeon HD 6290M reaches 140 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro NVS 420 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 6290M uses TeraScale 2, both on 16 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6290M). Raw compute: 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 420) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6290M).

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	Radeon HD 6290M
G3D Mark Score	137	140+2%
Architecture	Pascal	TeraScale 2
Process Node	16 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2304+140%	960
Compute (TFLOPS)	7.589 TFLOPS+481%	1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	144+200%	48
L1 Cache	864 KB+350%	192 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	Radeon HD 6290M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro NVS 420 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6290M carries 512 MB. Quadro NVS 420 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 420 and System on the Radeon HD 6290M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro NVS 420) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6290M) — the Quadro NVS 420 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	Radeon HD 6290M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro NVS 420 draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 6290M's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon HD 6290M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 420) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6290M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	Radeon HD 6290M
TDP	100W	75W-25%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	160mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	1.4	1.9+36%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro NVS 420 (2018 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	Radeon HD 6290M
MSRP	$0	—
Codename	GP104	Blackcomb
Release	February 21 2018	January 4 2011
Ranking	#266	#654

Search Quadro NVS 420 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6290M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.