
Quadro NVS 420 vs Radeon HD 6290M

Quadro NVS 420
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6290M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6290M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro NVS 420 is significantly newer (2018 vs 2011). The Quadro NVS 420 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6290M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6290M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro NVS 420 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro NVS 420 | Radeon HD 6290M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 6290M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro NVS 420 and Radeon HD 6290M

Quadro NVS 420
The Quadro NVS 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.

Radeon HD 6290M
The Radeon HD 6290M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 140 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro NVS 420 scores 137 and the Radeon HD 6290M reaches 140 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro NVS 420 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 6290M uses TeraScale 2, both on 16 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6290M). Raw compute: 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 420) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6290M).
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | Radeon HD 6290M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 137 | 140+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+140% | 960 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.589 TFLOPS+481% | 1.306 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+200% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 864 KB+350% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | Radeon HD 6290M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro NVS 420 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6290M has 512 MB. The Quadro NVS 420 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro NVS 420) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6290M) — the Quadro NVS 420 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | Radeon HD 6290M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro NVS 420 draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 6290M's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon HD 6290M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 420) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6290M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | Radeon HD 6290M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 1.9+36% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro NVS 420 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | Radeon HD 6290M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | Blackcomb |
| Release | February 21 2018 | January 4 2011 |
| Ranking | #266 | #654 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















