Quadro NVS 420 vs GeForce 9500M GS

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9500M GS

#618

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

4891%

#620

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

4433%

#621

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

4422%

#625

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

4021%

#626

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

3993%

#628

GeForce 9500M GS

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

100%

#629

GeForce 8800 GS

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

99%

#631

GeForce 9800 GTX+

MSRP: $229|Avg: $50

96%

#632

Mobility Radeon X1700

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

96%

#633

Mobility Radeon HD 560v

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

95%

#634

GeForce 9300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $20

95%

#635

Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU

MSRP: $899|Avg: $400

95%

#636

GeForce 8400M G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $20

95%

#637

GeForce 8400M GS

MSRP: $50|Avg: $20

94%

#638

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

94%

#639

GeForce 9100

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

92%

#640

GeForce 8300

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

92%

#641

GeForce 9600M GT

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

92%

#642

Mobility Radeon HD 3430

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

90%

#643

Mobility Radeon HD serie 4200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro NVS 420 is significantly newer (2018 vs 2008). The Quadro NVS 420 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9500M GS lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro NVS 420 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9500M GS.

Insight	Quadro NVS 420	GeForce 9500M GS
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+700%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 9500M GS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $20 for the Quadro NVS 420, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 29.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro NVS 420	GeForce 9500M GS
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+29.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20)	✅More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro NVS 420 Benchmark Check

GeForce 9500M GS Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro NVS 420 and GeForce 9500M GS

Quadro NVS 420

The Quadro NVS 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.

GeForce 9500M GS

The GeForce 9500M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 133 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro NVS 420 scores 137 and the GeForce 9500M GS reaches 133 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro NVS 420 is built on Pascal while the GeForce 9500M GS uses G9x, both on 16 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 224 (GeForce 9500M GS).

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	GeForce 9500M GS
G3D Mark Score	137+3%	133
Architecture	Pascal	G9x
Process Node	16 nm	65 nm
Shading Units	2304+929%	224

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	GeForce 9500M GS
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro NVS 420 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9500M GS has 512 MB. The Quadro NVS 420 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	GeForce 9500M GS
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9500M GS). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	GeForce 9500M GS
DirectX	10_0	10.0
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (Quadro NVS 420) vs No (GeForce 9500M GS). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs PureVideo HD VP2.

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	GeForce 9500M GS
Encoder	PureVideo HD	No
Decoder	PureVideo HD	PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs	—	MPEG-2,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro NVS 420 draws 100W versus the GeForce 9500M GS's 150W — a 40% difference. The Quadro NVS 420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 420) vs 350W (GeForce 9500M GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Quadro NVS 420	GeForce 9500M GS
TDP	100W-33%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	160mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	1.4+56%	0.9

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro NVS 420 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce 9500M GS launched at $60 and now averages $15. The GeForce 9500M GS costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.8 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 8.9 (GeForce 9500M GS) — the GeForce 9500M GS offers 30.9% better value. The Quadro NVS 420 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2008).