
Quadro NVS 420
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro NVS 420 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro NVS 420 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7246% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro NVS 420.
| Insight | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7246%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7246%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $60 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2348.7% better value per dollar than the Quadro NVS 420.
| Insight | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2348.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro NVS 420 and GeForce GTX 1060

Quadro NVS 420
The Quadro NVS 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro NVS 420 scores 137 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 7246%. The Quadro NVS 420 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 420) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1647 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 137 | 10,064+7246% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.589 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1647 MHz | 1733 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 160+11% |
| L1 Cache | 864 KB | 960 KB+11% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro NVS 420 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 12+20% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (Quadro NVS 420) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC (Pascal).
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro NVS 420 draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 57.1% difference. The Quadro NVS 420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 420) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-44% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 173mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 55.9+3893% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro NVS 420 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The Quadro NVS 420 costs 66.7% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.8 (Quadro NVS 420) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 2366.2% better value. The Quadro NVS 420 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro NVS 420 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-67% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 167.7+2366% |
| Codename | GP104 | GP104 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #266 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















